<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scott Samuels&#039; Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au</link>
	<description>Scott Samuels on SharePoint</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:44:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Using SPChangeQuery in a new Site (SPWeb) by Carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2009/06/23/using-spchangequery-in-a-new-site-spweb/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=141#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

Thanks a lot for your help. When I saw the results in a Console I am not able to see the ADD.

But in the actual back end I developed using Switch statements for each Object Type and Change Type, I was able to see &quot;ADD&quot; event logged.

But now I am stuck up with Deletes, i am not able to see any information except the ID of the change object.
I am not able to get the other information  like URL and child items that are also deleted.

Can you help me with this by sharing your ideas?


Thanks again for you time.

Thanks
Carol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for your help. When I saw the results in a Console I am not able to see the ADD.</p>
<p>But in the actual back end I developed using Switch statements for each Object Type and Change Type, I was able to see &#8220;ADD&#8221; event logged.</p>
<p>But now I am stuck up with Deletes, i am not able to see any information except the ID of the change object.<br />
I am not able to get the other information  like URL and child items that are also deleted.</p>
<p>Can you help me with this by sharing your ideas?</p>
<p>Thanks again for you time.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Carol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using SPChangeQuery in a new Site (SPWeb) by Carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2009/06/23/using-spchangequery-in-a-new-site-spweb/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=141#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

Thanks a ton for your response.

Actually I am not able to see that when I do this-

foreach (SPChange change in changes)
                                    {
                                        Console.WriteLine(&quot;\r\nDate: {0}&quot;, timeZone.UTCToLocalTime(change.Time).ToString());
                                        Console.WriteLine(&quot;Object type: {0}&quot;, change.GetType().ToString());
                                        Console.WriteLine(&quot;Change type: {0}&quot;, change.ChangeType);
}

But when I did this

switch (objType.Name)
                                        {
                                            case &quot;SPChangeWeb&quot;:
                                                {
                                                    SPChangeWeb changeWeb = change as SPChangeWeb;
                                                    Guid owebId = changeWeb.Id;
                                                    var Q = from SPWeb oweb in ositeCollection.AllWebs
                                                            where oweb.ID == owebId
                                                            select oweb;

Now it is working, it is logging as &quot;Add&quot; now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>Thanks a ton for your response.</p>
<p>Actually I am not able to see that when I do this-</p>
<p>foreach (SPChange change in changes)<br />
                                    {<br />
                                        Console.WriteLine(&#8220;\r\nDate: {0}&#8221;, timeZone.UTCToLocalTime(change.Time).ToString());<br />
                                        Console.WriteLine(&#8220;Object type: {0}&#8221;, change.GetType().ToString());<br />
                                        Console.WriteLine(&#8220;Change type: {0}&#8221;, change.ChangeType);<br />
}</p>
<p>But when I did this</p>
<p>switch (objType.Name)<br />
                                        {<br />
                                            case &#8220;SPChangeWeb&#8221;:<br />
                                                {<br />
                                                    SPChangeWeb changeWeb = change as SPChangeWeb;<br />
                                                    Guid owebId = changeWeb.Id;<br />
                                                    var Q = from SPWeb oweb in ositeCollection.AllWebs<br />
                                                            where oweb.ID == owebId<br />
                                                            select oweb;</p>
<p>Now it is working, it is logging as &#8220;Add&#8221; now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using SPChangeQuery in a new Site (SPWeb) by Scott Samuels</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2009/06/23/using-spchangequery-in-a-new-site-spweb/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Samuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=141#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Carol, 

Thanks for the comment. To the best of my knowledge, the addition of a site is not logged as a change. If you have a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.sharepoint.spchangetype.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SPChangeType Enumeration&lt;/a&gt; on MSDN, you can see that the &quot;Add&quot; change type only relates to &lt;strong&gt;items&lt;/strong&gt; being added to a specific scope. The change you are seeing is generated when SharePoint makes a change to the global navigation when you add a new site. I suspect that if you do not inherit the local or global navigation when you create a new site, you may not see any change recorded (try it and let me know what you find).

If you use the Publishing feature, you will see the creation of new &lt;strong&gt;pages&lt;/strong&gt; logged as an &quot;Add&quot; change type because these are being created in the Pages list (instantiated by the Publishing feature when activated).

If you want to track the creation of SPWebs as a change that you can pull out of an SPChangeQuery, you may want to investigate adding a record to the dbo.eventlog table in the appropriate content database (SPChangeQuery is querying this table for its events). I would add the record in a feature that is stapled to the &quot;GLOBAL&quot; site definition (this will execute the feature on all sites, although I have heard reports that GLOBAL site definition does not include blank sites). If I were to hazard a guess I would say that this would be an unsupported solution from Microsoft&#039;s perspective as you would be directly accessing the content database to write the record...

Hope this helps, let me know how you go. If you have any more questions I am more than happy to answer them.

Regards, 
Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol, </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. To the best of my knowledge, the addition of a site is not logged as a change. If you have a look at <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.sharepoint.spchangetype.aspx" rel="nofollow">SPChangeType Enumeration</a> on MSDN, you can see that the &#8220;Add&#8221; change type only relates to <strong>items</strong> being added to a specific scope. The change you are seeing is generated when SharePoint makes a change to the global navigation when you add a new site. I suspect that if you do not inherit the local or global navigation when you create a new site, you may not see any change recorded (try it and let me know what you find).</p>
<p>If you use the Publishing feature, you will see the creation of new <strong>pages</strong> logged as an &#8220;Add&#8221; change type because these are being created in the Pages list (instantiated by the Publishing feature when activated).</p>
<p>If you want to track the creation of SPWebs as a change that you can pull out of an SPChangeQuery, you may want to investigate adding a record to the dbo.eventlog table in the appropriate content database (SPChangeQuery is querying this table for its events). I would add the record in a feature that is stapled to the &#8220;GLOBAL&#8221; site definition (this will execute the feature on all sites, although I have heard reports that GLOBAL site definition does not include blank sites). If I were to hazard a guess I would say that this would be an unsupported solution from Microsoft&#8217;s perspective as you would be directly accessing the content database to write the record&#8230;</p>
<p>Hope this helps, let me know how you go. If you have any more questions I am more than happy to answer them.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using SPChangeQuery in a new Site (SPWeb) by Carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2009/06/23/using-spchangequery-in-a-new-site-spweb/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=141#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

I am wondering why the Change Type is not shown as &quot;ADD&quot; when a new site is created.

I am working with SPChange class and calling GetChanges on every site collection.

Results look like:(for new site created under sitecollection)

The object type is shown as SPChangeWeb
The Change Type is shown as &quot;Navigation&quot;.

Is this a bug ?
Can you help me with this. How to know that a new site has been added using GetChanges()


Thanks
Carol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>I am wondering why the Change Type is not shown as &#8220;ADD&#8221; when a new site is created.</p>
<p>I am working with SPChange class and calling GetChanges on every site collection.</p>
<p>Results look like:(for new site created under sitecollection)</p>
<p>The object type is shown as SPChangeWeb<br />
The Change Type is shown as &#8220;Navigation&#8221;.</p>
<p>Is this a bug ?<br />
Can you help me with this. How to know that a new site has been added using GetChanges()</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Carol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free professional SharePoint help? I&#8217;m now answering questions on Aardvark by Aardvark Q&#38;A - SharePoint, Web Application Zones and Email &#124; Scott Samuels&#39; Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2010/02/05/free-professional-sharepoint-help-im-now-answering-questions-on-aardvark/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Aardvark Q&#38;A - SharePoint, Web Application Zones and Email &#124; Scott Samuels&#39; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=459#comment-446</guid>
		<description>[...] domains. We were going to use the .ca internally &#039;;  If you wish to send me a question on Aardvark (What is Aardvark?), add me to your Aardvark network by searching for aardvark@sharepoint2007.com.au. William from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] domains. We were going to use the .ca internally &#39;;  If you wish to send me a question on Aardvark (What is Aardvark?), add me to your Aardvark network by searching for <a href="mailto:aardvark@sharepoint2007.com.au">aardvark@sharepoint2007.com.au</a>. William from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint Reporting Services Headaches by SharePoint Reporting Services and SharePoint Meeting Workspaces &#124; Scott Samuels&#39; Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2010/01/07/sharepoint-reporting-services-headaches/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>SharePoint Reporting Services and SharePoint Meeting Workspaces &#124; Scott Samuels&#39; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=351#comment-418</guid>
		<description>[...] from data in a SharePoint Meeting Workspace as there are so&#039;;  In a post last week I discussed some headaches I had experienced when using SharePoint Reporting Services, based on SQL Server Reporting Services, to create a report based on SharePoint lists. In this post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from data in a SharePoint Meeting Workspace as there are so&#39;;  In a post last week I discussed some headaches I had experienced when using SharePoint Reporting Services, based on SQL Server Reporting Services, to create a report based on SharePoint lists. In this post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disappointing speakers at Australian Tech.Ed 2009 by Scott Samuels</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2009/09/14/disappointing-speakers-tech-ed/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Samuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=298#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Alex, I agree wholeheartedly. The expo at Tech.Ed was excellent for establishing contacts with Microsoft ISV&#039;s. It was much harder though to establish contacts with fellow SharePoint portal architects and application developers/designers.

Microsoft had tables that were signposted with group names like &quot;Premier Service Partners&quot;, &quot;Women in IT&quot; (I think there were about 10 women in attendance!) and so forth but nothing at the technology level which was a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I agree wholeheartedly. The expo at Tech.Ed was excellent for establishing contacts with Microsoft ISV&#8217;s. It was much harder though to establish contacts with fellow SharePoint portal architects and application developers/designers.</p>
<p>Microsoft had tables that were signposted with group names like &#8220;Premier Service Partners&#8221;, &#8220;Women in IT&#8221; (I think there were about 10 women in attendance!) and so forth but nothing at the technology level which was a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disappointing speakers at Australian Tech.Ed 2009 by Alex Angas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2009/09/14/disappointing-speakers-tech-ed/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Angas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=298#comment-74</guid>
		<description>I find conferences are more about who you meet and building contacts. They draw together top people from across the country into one place.

The content can be found elsewhere and after the conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find conferences are more about who you meet and building contacts. They draw together top people from across the country into one place.</p>
<p>The content can be found elsewhere and after the conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft TechEd 2009, Australia by Peter Birkle</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2009/09/06/microsoft-teched-2009-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Birkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=289#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Great blog site.
Check out my web site.
http://www.ecotelegraph.com

I am an ECO Evangelist at the University of Wolllongong.
Go Green IT.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Great blog site.<br />
Check out my web site.<br />
<a href="http://www.ecotelegraph.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecotelegraph.com</a></p>
<p>I am an ECO Evangelist at the University of Wolllongong.<br />
Go Green IT.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Live &#8211; Is SharePoint 2010 right under our noses? by Scott Samuels</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/2009/07/03/windows-live-is-sharepoint-2010-right-under-our-noses/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Samuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 03:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sharepoint2007.com.au/?p=172#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Certainly I would agree that Microsoft&#039;s own use of Silverlight has been quite limited, especially when it comes to their Live offerings. Perhaps this is in favor of a snappy, lightweight approach to web applications that appeal to (and can be accessed by) the masses. 

Bear in mind that a lot of the time these services are accessed from shared computers or workstations that the user has no control over what applications get installed. If Silverlight was used and the plugin was not installed on the computer, the service would be rendered useless.

Don&#039;t forget to check out Skydrive and Office Live Workspaces for SharePoint workspace-like functionality. I&#039;m unaware of any integration with Groove. You can certainly launch SkyDrive from Live Messenger and use it to share files as opposed from directly transferring the file P2P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly I would agree that Microsoft&#8217;s own use of Silverlight has been quite limited, especially when it comes to their Live offerings. Perhaps this is in favor of a snappy, lightweight approach to web applications that appeal to (and can be accessed by) the masses. </p>
<p>Bear in mind that a lot of the time these services are accessed from shared computers or workstations that the user has no control over what applications get installed. If Silverlight was used and the plugin was not installed on the computer, the service would be rendered useless.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget to check out Skydrive and Office Live Workspaces for SharePoint workspace-like functionality. I&#8217;m unaware of any integration with Groove. You can certainly launch SkyDrive from Live Messenger and use it to share files as opposed from directly transferring the file P2P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
